0.11/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 1440 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 180 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 04:07:39 EDT 2024 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.18/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m2sbA6TEy3/E---3.1_20330.p 0.68/0.79 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.68/0.79 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA. 0.68/0.79 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.68/0.79 # Starting new_ho_10 with 540s (3) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting new_ho_5 with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting sh9 with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # sh2lt with pid 20416 completed with status 0 0.68/0.79 # Result found by sh2lt 0.68/0.79 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA. 0.68/0.79 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.68/0.79 # Starting new_ho_10 with 540s (3) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.68/0.79 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN 0.68/0.79 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.68/0.79 # Starting sh6 with 109s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # sh6 with pid 20421 completed with status 0 0.68/0.79 # Result found by sh6 0.68/0.79 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA. 0.68/0.79 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.68/0.79 # Starting new_ho_10 with 540s (3) cores 0.68/0.79 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.68/0.79 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN 0.68/0.79 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.68/0.79 # Starting sh6 with 109s (1) cores 0.68/0.79 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s 0.68/0.79 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.68/0.79 0.68/0.79 # Proof found! 0.68/0.79 # SZS status Theorem 0.68/0.79 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_sort1, type, pi: $tType). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_sort2, type, name: $tType). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_sort3, type, late_freeRes: $tType). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_sort4, type, late_residual: $tType). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_27, type, res: name > pi > pi). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_28, type, sum: pi > pi > pi). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_34, type, late_FreeR: late_freeRes > pi > late_residual). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_37, type, late_transitions: pi > late_residual > $o). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_48, type, fresh_1641682979reeRes: name > late_freeRes > $o). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_101, type, p: pi). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_103, type, q: pi). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_104, type, q2: pi). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_106, type, alpha: late_freeRes). 0.68/0.79 thf(decl_107, type, x: name). 0.68/0.79 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (sum @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ q2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m2sbA6TEy3/E---3.1_20330.p', conj_0)). 0.68/0.79 thf(fact_13_ResF, axiom, ![X4:pi, X45:late_freeRes, X7:pi, X6:name]:(((late_transitions @ X4 @ (late_FreeR @ X45 @ X7))=>((fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X6 @ X45)=>(late_transitions @ (res @ X6 @ X4) @ (late_FreeR @ X45 @ (res @ X6 @ X7)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m2sbA6TEy3/E---3.1_20330.p', fact_13_ResF)). 0.68/0.79 thf(fact_2__092_060open_062P_A_092_060oplus_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AQ_H_092_060close_062, axiom, (late_transitions @ (sum @ p @ q) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ q2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m2sbA6TEy3/E---3.1_20330.p', fact_2__092_060open_062P_A_092_060oplus_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AQ_H_092_060close_062)). 0.68/0.79 thf(fact_0_cRes_Ohyps_I2_J, axiom, (fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.m2sbA6TEy3/E---3.1_20330.p', fact_0_cRes_Ohyps_I2_J)). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (sum @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ q2))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1656:pi, X1657:late_freeRes, X1658:pi, X1659:name]:((~(late_transitions @ X1656 @ (late_FreeR @ X1657 @ X1658))|(~(fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X1659 @ X1657)|(late_transitions @ (res @ X1659 @ X1656) @ (late_FreeR @ X1657 @ (res @ X1659 @ X1658)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_13_ResF])])])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (sum @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ q2))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1:name, X7:pi, X4:pi, X17:late_freeRes]:(((late_transitions @ (res @ X1 @ X4) @ (late_FreeR @ X17 @ (res @ X1 @ X7)))|~((late_transitions @ X4 @ (late_FreeR @ X17 @ X7)))|~((fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X1 @ X17)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_8, plain, (late_transitions @ (sum @ p @ q) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ q2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2__092_060open_062P_A_092_060oplus_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AQ_H_092_060close_062])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (sum @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ q2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:name]:(((late_transitions @ (res @ X1 @ (sum @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ X1 @ q2)))|~((fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X1 @ alpha)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_11, plain, (fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_cRes_Ohyps_I2_J])). 0.68/0.79 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']). 0.68/0.79 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.68/0.79 # Parsed axioms : 431 0.68/0.79 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 189 0.68/0.79 # Initial clauses : 776 0.68/0.79 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 16 0.68/0.79 # Initial clauses in saturation : 760 0.68/0.79 # Processed clauses : 1663 0.68/0.79 # ...of these trivial : 14 0.68/0.79 # ...subsumed : 413 0.68/0.79 # ...remaining for further processing : 1236 0.68/0.79 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 57 0.68/0.79 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.68/0.79 # Backward-subsumed : 15 0.68/0.79 # Backward-rewritten : 16 0.68/0.79 # Generated clauses : 1988 0.68/0.79 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1813 0.68/0.79 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.68/0.79 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.68/0.79 # Paramodulations : 1903 0.68/0.79 # Factorizations : 2 0.68/0.79 # NegExts : 1 0.68/0.79 # Equation resolutions : 77 0.68/0.79 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.68/0.79 # Total rewrite steps : 192 0.68/0.79 # ...of those cached : 118 0.68/0.79 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.68/0.79 # Propositional check models : 0 0.68/0.79 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.68/0.79 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.68/0.79 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.68/0.79 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.68/0.79 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.68/0.79 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.68/0.79 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.68/0.79 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.68/0.79 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.68/0.79 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.68/0.79 # Current number of processed clauses : 475 0.68/0.79 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 144 0.68/0.79 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.68/0.79 # Negative unit clauses : 109 0.68/0.79 # Non-unit-clauses : 221 0.68/0.79 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1521 0.68/0.79 # ...number of literals in the above : 4237 0.68/0.79 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.68/0.79 # Current number of archived clauses : 737 0.68/0.79 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 200738 0.68/0.79 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57516 0.68/0.79 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 139 0.68/0.79 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2760 0.68/0.79 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.68/0.79 # BW rewrite match attempts : 519 0.68/0.79 # BW rewrite match successes : 13 0.68/0.79 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.68/0.79 # Condensation successes : 0 0.68/0.79 # Termbank termtop insertions : 95224 0.68/0.79 # Search garbage collected termcells : 15754 0.68/0.79 0.68/0.79 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.68/0.79 # User time : 0.216 s 0.68/0.79 # System time : 0.015 s 0.68/0.79 # Total time : 0.231 s 0.68/0.79 # Maximum resident set size: 5380 pages 0.68/0.79 0.68/0.79 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.68/0.79 # User time : 0.230 s 0.68/0.79 # System time : 0.019 s 0.68/0.79 # Total time : 0.249 s 0.68/0.79 # Maximum resident set size: 2632 pages 0.68/0.79 % E---3.1 exiting 0.68/0.79 % E exiting 0.68/0.79 EOF